Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 578961,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/578961/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 42,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. A.B. Duale",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 15,
        "legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
        "slug": "aden-duale"
    },
    "content": "Article 109 (5) says:- “A Bill may be introduced by any member or committee of the relevant House of Parliament, but a money Bill may be introduced only in the National Assembly in accordance with Article 114.” This is where we have a problem. The question that we need to raise is: Can those Bills that come from the Senate which are of money nature be termed as unconstitutional? The Speaker is under obligation to read any message from the Senate but, when that message is referred to a committee--- When the Senate introduces a Bill which is of money nature, that goes against Article 109(5). Then both Houses can be termed as those which are against the letter and the spirit of the Constitution. So, I want you to rule on how this House and its committees can deal with a Bill that is of money nature and that comes from the Senate, which is against Article 109(5). That is where I have a problem."
}