GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/581092/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 581092,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/581092/?format=api",
"text_counter": 88,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "debate on the Bill. The question is, having ruled yesterday on the basis of Standing Order No. 62 (3), would it be within your purview and authority to withdraw your ruling before the House and make another ruling? That should be the argument before this House. I am saying that, that issue was dealt with and spent yesterday when you pronounced yourself on Standing Order No. 62 (3). It will be the most irregular thing that we can then come back so many months, or days, later to deal with a Bill that has been dealt with just because the Speaker changed his attitude. You are supposed to be asked. On this one the mood did not show as it showed on the other one. You will be offending those of us who have issues with the approach. Many of us do not mind the date. We have no problem with it. However, as the leader of the Member who moved the Bill, I have tried to engage him but he seems not to want to engage us. There is the issue of Supreme Court judges and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) Commissioners."
}