Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 581133,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/581133/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 129,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "The reason why you are being told about the issue of form is because we have what I call “a penumbra of law”. It is actually clear in Standing Order No. 62(2), what Hon. Ochieng has alluded to. It talks of the “Noes” being no less than one-third, which was not obtained yesterday. We are going to be faced with similar situations. For me, the issue is that we can borrow from what has been done in other jurisdictions. I would like to give an example of the USA. I would want to refer to a case, even though this one is dealing with penumbra rights. I want you to borrow this and use what I would call penumbra powers. It is the case of Chriswold vs. Connecticut. It is 381/US/479. This case will not only affect this decision, but it is going to affect several other constitutional issues that we will be dealing with in this House."
}