Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 591335,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/591335/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 58,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Ethuro",
    "speaker_title": "The Speaker",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 158,
        "legal_name": "Ekwee David Ethuro",
        "slug": "ekwee-ethuro"
    },
    "content": " Order, Members! Of course, this kind of a ruling always elicits some lights moments. The Senate Majority Leader has given the sufficient dose. I just want to comment that I gave the definition of proper dressing as a coat, tie, long trousers, socks and shoes or service uniform or decent national dress for men and an equivalent standard for women with hats as an option. So, the hats are clearly for the women. However, the most important point I was making is about the dignity of the House. The manner of dressing must reflect the dignity of the House and the individual Senator. As to whether Senators have the option of coming in their various religious attires as mentioned by Sen. (Dr.) Machage, we will cross that bridge when we reach there. I agree with Sen. Haji that it depends on a common practice. If you just decide to do it for the sake of it, and we know you do not belong to that faith, it will a bit difficult for the Chair to entertain you dressed in a manner that is not consistent with your faith. The difficulties, of course, are to determine which faith you belong to. However, I believe that when we take records initially you have to indicate which faith you belong then we can use that. As to Sen. Mutahi Kagwe’s ‘my dress, my choice’, that is not for here. Here, we have defined proper dressing. So, the choices are a bit limited to the definition of proper dressing. Next Order."
}