Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 592689,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/592689/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 232,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Ganya",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 18,
        "legal_name": "Francis Chachu Ganya",
        "slug": "francis-ganya"
    },
    "content": "On this clause, we rejected the amendment from the Senate. The proposal from the Senate was to delete the provision for application for review of the decision of the CS to reject an application for a mineral right and subsequent provision for the communication of the decision in relation to the review. Therefore, one can only apply to the High Court if he is dissatisfied with the decision of the Cabinet. However, there is need for an internal mechanism for a review of a decision of a CS. This will assist in key resolutions of disputes as the court processes can be lengthy and expensive. Basically we felt that instead of people rushing to High Court there should be an internal mechanism for them to review any dispute that could arise. On that basis, we rejected that amendment of the Senate."
}