GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/59375/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 59375,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/59375/?format=api",
"text_counter": 68,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Ogindo",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 120,
"legal_name": "Martin Otieno Ogindo",
"slug": "martin-ogindo"
},
"content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to thank the Assistant Minister for his answer. However, the said Kilion Oudu was charged in court on 4th March, 2004. The sequence of events here is that Mr. Oudu was suspended administratively on 12th May, 2004. In the same letter, he was required to show cause why he should not be dismissed. Mr. Oudu was subsequently dismissed on 28th September, 2004. It is the KPA which took Mr. Oudu to court. The Magistrateâs Court, on 18th January, 2007, acquitted Mr. Oudu. My Question is: If it was KPA that took Mr. Oudu to court where he was charged - and where KPA was a principal witness - how come the same KPA could not adduce the same evidence in court to warrant his conviction, but found him administratively guilty?"
}