GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/598050/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 598050,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/598050/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 200,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "We have concluded Order No.7 on the Order Paper. If you wish to raise a substantive issue that might affect our procedure now and in the future, then maybe that would have been either by a substantive Motion or by a Motion brought to the House so that the Speaker can make a ruling. However, I made a decision last week which was accepted by the House that, in the first instance, our Speaker sitting here, made a ruling by a way of communication from the Chair. That ruling was final then. So, if you are seeking to revise that ruling or the communication from the Chair that was made by the Speaker, it would have to be done procedurally. He ruled on the issue of a Presidential Memorandum. That was on Tuesday last week. I mentioned to you that it would not be in my place to revise that ruling in the absence of a formal application to that effect because then, it would mean that we would not be setting a precedent for the House. However, as of now, the precedent is what the Speaker communicated to the House by way of the communication from the Chair. If you may recall, he made that communication then left the Chamber, then we went to Committee the following day. It was then that I had to make this decision last Thursday. Therefore, if the point of order you want to make now will be geared towards making me change that position, it will not be possible because---"
}