Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 600056,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/600056/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 456,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Eng.) Gumbo",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 24,
        "legal_name": "Nicholas Gumbo",
        "slug": "nicholas-gumbo"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I am sorry to drag you back on this matter. It is true that Clause 29(1) is talking about the Principal Judge in consultation with the Chief Justice. It is also true that the functions stated in Clause 29(2) are actually functions of the JSC. I do not see how providing those functions would at all be harmful towards the aspirations of this clause. I would have pleaded with my good friend, the Chairperson of the Departmental Committee on Justice and Legal Affairs, that even if it means removing the Chief Justice and ascribing those functions to the JSC, these are good functions. Honestly, the explanation that the functions would go into a code of conduct is a contradiction. There is no code of conduct issues here. We are just talking about performance management and auditing which are good functions."
}