Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 600162,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/600162/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 562,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kaluma",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 1565,
        "legal_name": "George Peter Opondo Kaluma",
        "slug": "george-peter-opondo-kaluma"
    },
    "content": "I would support the amendment, but what bothers me still is this power generally being given to the CJ to make rules particularly for the matters in Clause 40(2)(a), (b) and (g). I would propose that in as much as that amendment should be supported, we should delete Clause 40(2)(g). The rules governing contempt of injunctions under Order 40 are made pursuant to Section 81 of the Civil Procedure Act."
}