Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 604759,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/604759/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 471,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Lati",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2762,
        "legal_name": "Jonathan Lelelit Lati",
        "slug": "jonathan-lelelit-lati"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady. It makes sense because interest is an accrual and it should not exceed the tax liability. However, it does not make a lot of sense to have a penalty that exceeds the interest liability. That is still captured in Clause 38 in a better way. Interest accrues. So, there is a reason to put a ceiling on interest so that it does not exceed the tax liability. However, I do not see any reason why a penalty would be more than the tax itself unless it says “payable penalty and interest”, but it says “payable penalty or interest”. I support but I do not think it makes a lot of sense."
}