GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/614893/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 614893,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/614893/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 738,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang’",
    "speaker_title": "The Temporary Deputy Chairman",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": " I profess no technical knowledge in planning. I only know something about law and legislation. What worries me is that you want to say that there is no period within which an applicant should complete the building works but you want to leave the part which penalises such person. Why would you be penalising if you are going to delete sub-clause (1)? If sub-clause (1) goes, sub-clause (2) must also go. You want to delete sub-clause (1) and leave provision for penalty in sub-clause (2)? You will not penalise anybody because there will be nobody to commit the offence."
}