GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/618320/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 618320,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/618320/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 112,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Ng’ongo",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 110,
        "legal_name": "John Mbadi Ng'ong'o",
        "slug": "john-mbadi"
    },
    "content": "obviously, as a ranking member. I would make contribution as if it is a shadow minister for finance because this is not a parliamentary system. It is a presidential system and so you would call him a ranking member. In my view, there is nothing wrong. This is a Commonwealth practice. It is practised in many jurisdictions. I do not see why Members should have a problem with it. All Members are equal but, we must also recognise that parties have positions. At times you get embarrassed when a party has a position and a Member speaking purportedly on behalf of that coalition is speaking as though he is speaking for another coalition. That is not enriching debate. It is not a question of arguing. The question here is that we want to hear both sides of arguments. That is what is called “debate”. It is not just a matter of passing---"
}