Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 632679,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/632679/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 117,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Anami",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2773,
        "legal_name": "Lisamula Silverse Anami",
        "slug": "lisamula-silverse-anami"
    },
    "content": "The point of my argument is the usage of the term “traditional,” because it reduces this scope of cultural expressions to only traditions and yet traditions fall in the category of intangible culture. It means that we leave out the whole scope of tangible culture and we also leave out the whole scope of human creativity and cultural diversity which is the import of this article. Whereas I am supporting the Committee’s proposal that we use the words “promote positive traditional culture”, especially the spirit of it, I would like to refer to Article 10 which already takes care of that under “sustainable development”. The substantive meaning of “sustainable development” takes care of repugnancy. It cannot be repugnant. If Article 10 refers to sustainable development, then we do not need to worry about promoting “positive”, because obviously that must be positive. If it is not positive it will not be sustainable. So, that is taken care of by the Constitution. However, it is harmless the way it is if it means just enlarging the meaning to the ordinary public."
}