GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/639395/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 639395,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/639395/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 265,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Nyasuna",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 590,
        "legal_name": "Gladys Atieno Nyasuna",
        "slug": "gladys-atieno-nyasuna"
    },
    "content": "(h) the need for affirmative action in respect of disadvantaged areas and groups” As I have said, disadvantaged areas and marginalised areas have been provided for expressly through the Equalisation Fund. What I want to make a case on is the affirmative action groups or marginalised groups. The Bill mentions Affirmative Action Fund but puts it under “other national obligations.” Affirmative Action Fund is not just under other national obligations. It truly is a direct constitutional provision that should be put on a line of its own as provided for in the Constitution that we should allocate funds for the need of affirmative action groups."
}