GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/639686/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 639686,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/639686/?format=api",
"text_counter": 245,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "In February, 2013, the contractor was finally given the notice of contract termination due to non-performance. The contractor then went to court challenging the decision of the client to levy the liquidated damages. He also wanted to prevent the client from terminating the contract. The parties then engaged in seeking an amicable solution out of court. The process was not successful due to disagreements on the amount owed to the contactor and the levying of the liquidated damages. The contractor reverted to the court. The matter is still before court. I have attached a chronology of the events in this matter. I may not have to read the attached pages. With regard to the progress of the construction of the dam to date, it stands at 57 per cent as I foresaid which was the position when the work stalled. At that time, site clearance and excavation had been done as well as the diversion culvert. The downstream cover dam had also been completed while grouting works were 75 per cent complete. Still outstanding, however, is the construction of the main dam embankment and the spill way."
}