Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 640855,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/640855/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 295,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "These particular proposed amendments will strengthen what we intend to do as a House. I disagree with some of the proponents who have not agreed with the Clause on consultation saying it is a recipe for disaster and maybe a creation of two centres of power. Why do we not want people to consult? Consultation is a good thing especially if you are consulting somebody that you went before the residents with. These residents are your bosses because they are the people who elected you, and you told them that you would be working with so and so from the first day in office until the last day. How difficult is it to sit down with that individual and agree on certain items? I believe that by the time you go to campaign, your mind is still quite fresh and ambitious as someone seeking to be elected and you have good vision of the county at that point. That is why you pick a particular individual and say that this is the person that we shall have meetings to discuss how to take the county forward. I do not know what happens at some point during somebody’s term in office that it gets to a point where they cannot talk to each other. I support the inclusion of the clause that governors will consult deputy governors and it should be a requirement. It is good ground that a deputy governor can rise and say that the governor is violating the Constitution because they have not been consulted. I believe decisions are better reached when you sit down and reason out together because it clears out all the grey areas that people may be having. Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, I would also wish to---"
}