Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 673748,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/673748/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 615,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "administration and management. You can never undermine these specific aspects especially for management at the county level. I think the contention in this Bill is on the clauses that sort of tie the tenure of these officers with those of governors. I have just had a quick check to confirm that. Those who were employed by the CPSB should be on permanent and pensionable terms. Therefore, we should not have a situation where we have these terms attached to a particular governor. If that is the case, it will undermine the whole issue of transition from one governor to the other and we will be having different people all the time and that will create problems. As we continue with this debate, I hope we will have consensus about this and look at it again as we move to the amendments. We want to understand what ails this process so that we solve the problem. We have to amend this so that we follow what is provided by the CPSB. We should also ensure that people who are employed are qualified and they can do the job well on a long term basis. Looking at the role that these particular office bearers should play, including service delivery, provision of infrastructure, reaching out to the community and ensuring participation, this becomes a key amendment to this Bill which will help structures at counties such as wards and villages. That is key for devolution to succeed. Madam Temporary Speaker, thank you."
}