GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/676951/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 676951,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/676951/?format=api",
"text_counter": 195,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. A.B. Duale",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 15,
"legal_name": "Aden Bare Duale",
"slug": "aden-duale"
},
"content": "Clause 17 of the Bill proposes to amend Section 66 of the principal Act so as to include monitoring of non-financial performers. This is basically important in linking financial resources to actual output achieved whereas Clause 18 of the Bill proposes to amend Section 68 to, again, clarify the role of the CS for relevant entity. This is a very important Bill. The most important was on Clause 13 which I spent a lot of time on. This is another very important one. I want Members to go with me. Clause 37 proposes to amend Section 123(3) of the Act to remove the requirement to submit county government debt management strategy to the Commission on Revenue Allocation and intergovernmental budget and economic--- I was wondering why that is removed. This is one amendment that we need to disagree with the CS because counties are now wallowing in debts. There are contractors everywhere. A question that must be asked is whether those pending bills are transferable from one government to another or from one governor to another. In fact, we must amend it further and put a very strong system on how to provide the county government debt management strategy."
}