GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/692121/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 692121,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/692121/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 72,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. (Eng.) Muriuki",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2559,
        "legal_name": "Stephen Muriuki Ngare",
        "slug": "stephen-muriuki-ngare"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, I support and compliment you for coming up with a clear direction on how to proceed on this. None of us was under the illusion that it was going to be an easy process. I want to comment on the beginning and the end of it, more so, on the comments by Sen. (Dr.) Khalwale. When we are in a Committee dealing with impeachment proceedings, it is the same 11 Members who listen to the same charges and answers at the same time. However, when we are in the Committee of the Whole, there is that little challenge that Members come and go. Therefore, in the opening session, there will be need to clearly spell out the charges. Again, since the clerks will be writing down what the charges and responses are, I suggest that, that session should not be for debate. The session is for what has been recorded in the proceedings; the same way a Committee may retreat to debate whether or not they agree, because they have to present a report to the House. In this case, it is seeking a reasonable concurrence on what was said and what the response was, so that there is a reasonable concurrence on what we will be voting on. Therefore, when we come here, each delegation will vote according to their understanding of what was clarified from the records by the Clerk. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, Sir."
}