GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/693420/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 693420,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/693420/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 299,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. Murkomen",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 440,
        "legal_name": "Onesimus Kipchumba Murkomen",
        "slug": "kipchumba-murkomen"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Speaker Sir, the senior counsel, Sen. Orengo and Sen. Wako, will help me here. If that is the case that this witness is going to be there to answer all questions related to the case that have been put forward by the lawyers, how then should we proceed? If we cross-examine him at the moment, we are going to do partly work, maybe do the case of the Governor first at the moment. If we were going to deal with it later after the Governor has done his case, it becomes now easy for us to seek the clarification. If we do it before hand, before the Governor does his case, to the best of my knowledge, at the moment, considering that the lawyer is saying he is answering everything related to what was presented, means that we will preempt at some instance the case of the Governor which may appear to be that in some instance, we are assisting the Governor. Would it then be better for us if we are going to ask clarifications as Senators to postpone that after the Governor has done his case because that witness will still be around to deal with that matter? That is just out of an observation. Thank you."
}