Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 697990,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/697990/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 68,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Ms.) Muhia",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 968,
        "legal_name": "Wanjiku Muhia",
        "slug": "wanjiku-muhia"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Speaker, that is quite clear. I will go by your direction. Let me then say that when company “X” enters into an MoU with company “Y” and the MoU is meant to drive company “X” down, that is not lack of competence from the CEO but lack of credibility. I want to draw Members’ attention to the disciplinary case in this Bill that the country can use to be zero-tolerant to corruption. I want to assume that the member of company “X” who writes a wrong MoU with another company to bring down his, clearly, may not have the relevant training. Why? He does not see that billions of shillings are going to be lost when that company goes down. He is not looking at the job opportunities which are going to be lost when the company goes down. He is not looking at the medical care, the roads, communication and education that are supported by the income tax collected by the country when the company is running well. Most important is the disciplinary issue. I am of the idea and view that once a CEO of a board member is blacklisted, he should not just be given a certificate The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}