Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 704203,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/704203/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 101,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Ethuro",
    "speaker_title": "The Speaker",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 158,
        "legal_name": "Ekwee David Ethuro",
        "slug": "ekwee-ethuro"
    },
    "content": " Order, Members. The proceedings were going on well until unsolicited information came to the Floor. I have listened to all the Members and there are five more. I feel that I should not allow them because the rate at which the deliberations are going, they may not be of any usefulness. Let me deal with the ones that are before us. First, Sen. (Prof.) Anyang’-Nyong’o definitely talked of a circular. Sen. M. Kajwang seems to have a selective hearing. This is not even a matter of memory. He talked about a circular. He was informing Sen. Ndiema that there are no other circulars except the one he referred to. I do not want to repeat; he knows it and we all heard. He has been challenged by Sen. Sang, Sen. Kembi-Gitura and Sen. Sonko to substantiate or withdraw and apologise in the normal way we do business. So, Sen. (Prof.) Anyang’- Nyong’o has that burden to discharge. Secondly, for the same reason, Sen. Sonko demanded substantiation or an apology. In the process, he created his own. Sen. Sonko, the wheels of justice go both ways. You will have to substantiate about Sen. (Prof.) Anyang’-Nyong’o and the Senate Minority Leader. If you fail to do so, you withdraw and apologise. Finally, Sen. M. Kajwang could not hear what Sen. (Prof.) Anyang’-Nyong’o said. However, he was clear that he heard what Sen. Sonko said. He continued in the same trend that Sen. Sonko started and made an allegation against Sen. Sonko. To you, Sen. M. Kajwang, substantiate on the land issue against Sen. Sonko, or you withdraw and apologise. We will proceed along those lines."
}