GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/71377/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 71377,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/71377/?format=api",
"text_counter": 232,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Ms. Karua",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 166,
"legal_name": "Martha Wangari Karua",
"slug": "martha-karua"
},
"content": "Mr. Temporary Deputy Chairman, Sir, I oppose the amendment. One of the reasons is that I am looking at it and seeing (g) of the proposed amendment which reads:- “Two members to represent farmers’ organizations”; Which farmers’ organizations are these? All the farmers are already represented under Clause 4(e) which provides:- “(i) Two persons nominated by factory organizations to represent small tea producers”; (ii) one person nominated by plantation tea producer organizations”; (iii) one person nominated by registered auction organizers. (iv) one person nominated by registered tea packers; (v) two persons nominated by the Minister” Who are these farmers’ organizations? Can you bring coffee farmers to rule the tea industry? Can you bring horticulture farmers to rule the tea industry? I would want to urge my colleague to abandon this amendment. It is misplaced and the things that are being proposed have already been taken care of. It will introduce confusion. I beg to oppose."
}