GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/718275/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 718275,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/718275/?format=api",
"text_counter": 219,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. Kang’ata",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 1826,
"legal_name": "Irungu Kang'ata",
"slug": "irungu-kangata"
},
"content": "To me, the idea of barring people who are charged but not yet convicted from getting employment is quite troublesome because, as you know, the law and the constitution is very clear that every person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. So, to me, the right word should have been “convicted” alone so that you do away with the idea of being charged. You can as well be charged and then thereafter you are acquitted. Therefore, having been acquitted should not mean that you will never get employment to such kind of places. So, you should do away with the word “charged” and leave the term “convicted”."
}