Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 720684,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/720684/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 279,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Abongotum",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 165,
        "legal_name": "Asman Abongutum Kamama",
        "slug": "asman-kamama"
    },
    "content": "“reprimand” means a form of disciplinary action imposed after formal charges that declares an officer’s conduct improper; (f) by deleting the definition of the term “transfer of service” and substituting therefor the following new definition− “transfer of service” means the movement of appointment of a pensionable employee from one public service organization to another, which has reciprocal pension arrangements and has been declared a “Public Service” for purposes of preserving the employee’s previous pensionable services; and, (g) by inserting the following new definition in proper alphabetical sequence− “casual employee” has the meaning assigned to it in the Employment Act. The amendment to Clause 2 (a) seeks to conform to the definition of the Constitution. In Clause 2(b), the amendment seeks to give better clarity as well as to align it with Article 234(5) of the Constitution which gives the Commission the power to delegate its functions and powers. In Clause 2(c), the definition of the term “casual service” is deleted so as to have the definition of the term “casual employee” as provided for in the Employment Act. This is in line with the Employment Act. The amendment to Clause 2(d) is meant for the purposes of better clarity of the definition of the term “publicize”. The amendment in Clause 2(e) on reprimand is for purposes of better clarity of the term “reprimand”. In Clause 2(f) on the definition of the term “transfer of service”, this amendment is for purposes of better clarity of the definition of the same term. In Clause 2(g), the term “casual employee” is more generally recognised and is provided for in the Employment Act. Therefore, the amendment is necessary for purposes of aligning the Bill with the provisions of the Employment Act. This is meant to realign it with the provisions of the Employment Act."
}