Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 728024,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/728024/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 222,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Sakaja",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13131,
        "legal_name": "Johnson Arthur Sakaja",
        "slug": "johnson-arthur-sakaja"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Hon. Speaker. I would like to contribute to this amendment. When you look at it on the surface, there is not much to split hairs about because it is talking about end-to-end testing of technology. It says that the Commission shall issue a notice to specify time, place and testing. Clause 9(1) states; “and public notice shall be issued.” Regardless of 9(2), 9(1) already has said that the Commission shall issue a public notice. What 9(2) says is that the Commission may use its discretion to decide on which method to use in issuing notice. So, the Commission may decide to publish the information on its website or through electronic or print media, or posting it outside its offices, or through any other accessible medium. I do not think there is anything to split hairs about. I, however, support Hon. Eseli’s amendment. In fact, I would propose that we change from “may” to “shall” and in 9(2)(c), we say “and” after the semi-colon. This is so, so that they can use all those methods. If you just post it on your website, not all stakeholders will be able to access your website. If you choose to use option 4 which is, “through other accessible medium” and which is not specified---"
}