GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/734368/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 734368,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/734368/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 155,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Wamunyinyi",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 291,
        "legal_name": "Athanas Misiko Wafula Wamunyinyi",
        "slug": "athanas-wamunyinyi"
    },
    "content": "However, numerous public officers raised concerns regarding these agreements. As you would notice from what I explained earlier, it heavily favoured the House of Perfume. It raised a lot of concern from different departments of the Government and in a letter dated 28th April 1989, the Director of Aerodromes wrote to the Permanent Secretary for Internal Security questioning the wisdom in granting exclusive rights to the House of Perfume. Again, on 29th January 1990, the Director wrote to the PS, Ministry of Internal Security, raising concerns about why the House of Perfume was operating in restricted areas with exclusive rights and stated that being allowed to operate in restricted areas elicited fears of security nature. In another letter dated 19th February 1990, the board of airlines representatives wrote to the Minister of State, Office of the President, to express grave concern regarding activities of the House of Perfume. On 24th June, 1993, the Attorney- General wrote to the then Head of Public Service as follows: “Having carefully studied the matter, I have no evidence on record that the Attorney-General did certify in writing that the execution of the agreement on The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposesonly. A certified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}