Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 735215,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/735215/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 425,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang’",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairlady, the problem is that in this Chamber we sometimes--- Can the Hon. Member for Garissa Town just allow me get my thoughts together? We make contributions in this House thinking of individuals and when it is convenient to us. Looking at the original Bill, I realize that it is talking about the CJ. The further amendment is talking about the DCJ. My problem is neither the CJ nor his deputy. We have said in this House before that for a Bill such as this to come to the Floor of the House, it must be constitutional. This Bill has not gone through the normal processes required by Article 144 of the Constitution. This is a miscellaneous amendment provision which has not gone through those processes. If you are going to allow the AG--- The Hon. Leader of the Majority Party is criticizing the AG for doing haphazard things and yet he is also allowing the same AG to sneak things through the Statute Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Bill. My point is that this is a substantive issue; both the matter on the CJ and the DCJ should come as an amendment in which there is public participation. The matters should also be subjected to the Committee through the normal procedure."
}