GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/740978/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 740978,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/740978/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 298,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Gikaria",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2489,
        "legal_name": "David Gikaria",
        "slug": "david-gikaria"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, we need your guidance. If you go back to Clause 13 where we were changing “Commissioner” to “Director” what happens? Clause 13 got the favour of the Chair in the amendment by the Chair. It was also dropped. Then we have moved forward and the words “Director” and “Commissioner” are there. For purposes of clarity, does it mean that the Chair needs to withdraw and go back to Clause 13 and others and withdraw those amendments where we have them? As Neto is saying, they should be dealt with under Clause 2 where we will have everything. We need some clarity so that we do not have other clauses where we will have already approved Director and others we are now saying commissioners. We need some clarity and direction from you, Chair."
}