Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 745983,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/745983/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 364,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Gikaria",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2489,
        "legal_name": "David Gikaria",
        "slug": "david-gikaria"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Okoth has just alluded to the fact that we are in a campaign mood and might have forgotten some things. This is why I am saying we have already deleted 29 (f) and now we are deleting Clause 31. A person coming from outside this country with a firearm does not know the Kenyan law. So, he will walk in with the firearm. So, where does he place his firearm? We need to either leave 29 (f) intact which will provide for their separation, or leave Clause 31 as it is. I am a very keen legislator and I follow the proceedings of my Committee with a lot of interest. We have deleted Clause 29(f) which provided for separation of anyone carrying a firearm. We are now deleting Clause 31. Here is a combatant who has just come in with ammunitions. He is supposed to leave them somewhere and yet he does not know the laws of this country. These are some of the issues that we need to agree on. I thought at some point we were supposed to leave one of the clauses intact. I oppose the deletion. People walking in as refugees do not know the laws of the country. They will walk in with ammunitions or leave them in the forests. It is very dangerous."
}