GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/751441/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 751441,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/751441/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 333,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. (Dr.) Nyikal",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 434,
        "legal_name": "James Nyikal",
        "slug": "james-nyikal"
    },
    "content": "I know you have explained, but I am still concerned about the words “to be heard”. It gives so much leeway than, probably, where we were before. I would have thought that this would call for knowing the procedures that the parties lay down and whether that would go into the Political Parties Act. It would have been important. I would have proposed that it reads: “be heard according to the party’s laid down procedure”. You would expect that a party has that procedure. Then the party can be put to task for not following its own procedure. I am not a lawyer, but I know in law that is a very important principle."
}