GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/772459/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 772459,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/772459/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 319,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kigano",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13358,
        "legal_name": "Clement Muturi Kigano",
        "slug": "clement-muturi-kigano"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Hon. Speaker. The Motion smacks of unconstitutionality in the category laid down under Article 127(c)(ii). The second category of nominees appears to contravene the provisions of Article 27(c) (ii). Sub-article (ii) is in plural and it says “parties.” So, it is not one party or two parties, but all parties. My understanding from yesterday’s contribution is that the Wiper Democratic Movement (WDM), which is a parliamentary party, did not contribute to that communication and has not nominated. If it is a parliamentary party and it is not part of that nomination, the whole of that nomination stands vitiated. In other words, the whole communication to you must be endorsed jointly by all the political parties on the other side or singularly by each of those parties, especially those parties that are parliamentary. So, those three names, therefore, cannot stand and the whole exercise will be unconstitutional if we are to proceed."
}