Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 773020,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/773020/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 139,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Lusaka",
    "speaker_title": "The Speaker",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "or which by the operation of any written law, is secret. (2) A matter shall be considered to be sub judice when it refers to active criminal or civil proceedings and discussions of such matter is likely to prejudice its fair determination. (3) In determining whether a criminal or civil proceeding is active, the following shall apply:- (a) Criminal proceedings shall be deemed to be active when a charge has been made or a summons to appear has been issued; (b) Criminal proceedings shall be deemed to have ceased to be active when they are concluded by verdict and sentence or discontinuance; (c) Civil proceedings shall be deemed to be active when arrangements for hearing, such as setting down a case for trial have been made, until the proceedings are ended by judgement or by discontinuance; (d) Appellate proceedings whether criminal or civil shall be deemed to be active from the time when they are commenced by application for leave to appeal or by notice of appeal until the proceedings are ended by judgement or discontinuance. Therefore, I want to refer Sen. (Eng.) Mahamud to Standing Order 92 (4) which says that:- “A Senator alleging that a matter is sub judice shall provide evidence to show that paragraphs (2) and (3) are applicable.” I would like you to do that."
}