Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 779691,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/779691/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 139,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Sen. (Dr.) Zani",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13119,
        "legal_name": "Agnes Zani",
        "slug": "agnes-zani"
    },
    "content": "Mr. Speaker, Sir, the document might be available but it has not been validated. What we want is validation because if somebody speaks here on behalf of a Cabinet Secretary, it is the Cabinet Secretary speaking through them. I have also agonized about statements not being read when persons who sought them are not there. The issue was raised in the Eleventh Parliament and I am just wondering. Is it not time we thought statements are owned by the House? Statements should be read to Members present. If the person who sought a statement is not there, they can bring the matter up again if they need clarity or specificity. We will begin blaming Chairpersons in this Chamber for not giving statements because of waiting for persons who sought for them to be there. A statement belongs to the House and not the person who sought for it."
}