Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 784385,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/784385/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 209,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Mule",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2321,
        "legal_name": "Stephen Mutinda Mule",
        "slug": "stephen-mutinda-mule"
    },
    "content": "Clause 27 talks about a police officer or unauthorised person have responsible ground to believe. You know the kind of police force we have in this country. Imagine a police officer believing that you are a cybercrime officer. He comes to you and wants to deal with your office and wants to get into your office. We must be clear on when a person comes to investigate a cybercrime. We have heard in this House how cybercrime infringes into the rights of individuals. So, the police officers and authorised people must have very clear authority to perform their duty such that we do not get ourselves in cycles of cases. We are in a society where if anything happens and you feel aggrieved, you are allowed by our Constitution to move to court. I ask the Committee to re-look at Clause 27. Let us be specific and alive to the reality."
}