Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 787939,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/787939/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 584,
    "type": "other",
    "speaker_name": "",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "equipment that we can buy for our young people so that they can go and learn masonry, tailoring, et cetera . If those were the programmes that were being put forth or maybe the rehabilitation that is being thought about and sent forth here, then I would not have any reason to object to this. However, from experience, we have seen how these conditional grants are administered and the kind of crazy things that the county governments are doing because of misdirection from the Treasury. Having in mind the saying that “Once bitten, twice shy”, I am very hesitant to support such a programme that I know will not achieve the well-intended purpose, as it may be. The question of level five hospitals is a disaster waiting to happen. Even counties that neighbour each other grapple with this issue day in, day out. It is not a hidden secret for some of us who come from counties that are even monolithic in terms of the epic population. Despite being neighbours, I have seen, for example, if you go to Litein Level 5 Hospital in my county, you will find the residents confirming their various counties in the queue as they wait to see the doctor. They will regulate themselves on who is to see the doctor first and those from the neighbouring counties will have to wait until the residents of that particular county are served before they see the doctor. They do this because they know the drugs will run out and the doctor will also say that he or she has had enough for the day and will go home. This points to disorder in the management of our health facilities."
}