Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 789251,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/789251/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 210,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kajwang’",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2712,
        "legal_name": "Tom Joseph Kajwang'",
        "slug": "kajwang-tom-joseph-francis"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Speaker, I have listened to your address with a lot of anxiety. I have also listened to Members debate both the amendment and the Motion. I have also had an occasion to read the entire report the way it is. It would seem to me that we have put a lot of legislative energy to discuss something which Judiciary seems to have a knack and time for. We needed now to separate what is legislative business and what belongs to other people so that they can put as much time as they have in what they do. I rise under Standing Order 95(1). I think we have talked about this Motion sufficiently. In fact, looking at the Motion, I ask myself: So what do we do? So, what? No.1 says we are recognising that there is a conservatory order; No. 2 says that this thing is still in the process of the court. That seems to be the fact. So, even as we are adopting it, the Chairman of the Committee could have wanted the Motion to be noted by the House. There is no positive or substantive action we are going to express ourselves either to annul or sustain what is going on. So, we will just go around and we may waste a lot of emotions and even words that may not be here or there. I suggest that we note that certain things have happened and we let the process of law to take its course and we go on with the legislative business of this House. I am asking kindly if the Mover could be called upon to reply and then we dispose of this matter in the shortest time possible."
}