GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/790025/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 790025,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/790025/?format=api",
"text_counter": 490,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. Kimunya",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 174,
"legal_name": "Amos Muhinga Kimunya",
"slug": "amos-kimunya"
},
"content": "Sub-clause 6 of Clause 48, which he is seeking to amend, refers to compensation arising out of damage. It does not at all refer to compensation arising out of acquisition. So, we are using the right tools, but to amend the wrong clause. I think we should give him an extra opportunity to amend that clause at some appropriate point in future when he will amend the right clause. As far as I am concerned, whatever he has brought is null and void to the extent that it is seeking to amend a clause that does not need amendment in the same fashion."
}