GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/791299/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 791299,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/791299/?format=api",
"text_counter": 529,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Hon. (Dr.) Nyikal",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": {
"id": 434,
"legal_name": "James Nyikal",
"slug": "james-nyikal"
},
"content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, whereas I support the amendment, I would like some point to be clarified. How far upstream does this apply? If you can interfere with the water flow and the scheme is hundreds or tens of miles away and somebody is interfering with it far upstream, does this apply? If that is the case, then it is a good amendment. I support it. But, we have to remember that some people can do it far upstream."
}