GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/79141/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 79141,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/79141/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 321,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Mr. Deputy Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "Following the Moving of the Motion, hon. Ethuro rose on a point of order under Standing Order No.47(3) and specifically, paragraphs (b), (d) and (e), which require the Speaker to rule to be inadmissible, a certain proposed Motion, or rule that notice of such Motions be not given without such alteration as the Speaker may approve. It was hon. Ethuro’s contention that the Motion was inadmissible on three grounds. First, it is unconstitutional on account of being discriminatory in its effect, on account of the adverse effect it would have on some areas of the country by requiring that the survey in the words of the hon. Member, “was not comprehensive to be used in disregard of a more comprehensive survey.”"
}