Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 792906,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/792906/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 783,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Gikaria",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 2489,
        "legal_name": "David Gikaria",
        "slug": "david-gikaria"
    },
    "content": "Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman, I beg to move: THAT, Clause 204 the Bill be amended by deleting sub-clause (2) and substituting therefor the following new sub-clause― (2) Where energy infrastructure is removed, the surface of the land shall forthwith be restored to its former condition as far as possible by the licensee and in default thereof restoration may be carried out by the owner of the land, and the costs thereof shall be recoverable from the licensee. In this aspect, we are talking about when an infrastructure is removed and the land is supposed to be restored back to its original condition. We propose that as far as possible, the licensee should restore the land back to its former condition and in default, thereof, restoration may be carried out by the owner of the land. We are just saying that the first person to restore the land to its former self is the licensee. If he refuses, the owner can restore the land and then claim from the licensee through the court. If you allow the licensee, he might take forever. That is why we are substituting and redrafting that clause."
}