Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 793147,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/793147/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 1024,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Kimunya",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 174,
        "legal_name": "Amos Muhinga Kimunya",
        "slug": "amos-kimunya"
    },
    "content": "Thank you, Hon. Temporary Deputy Chairman. I rise to oppose this amendment or introduction of this New Clause at this stage. I have listened to the Mover. What he is trying to do does not solve the problem he is trying to solve. He seems to have a problem with Clause 147 which says “may”. But, this amendment is not referencing to amending the “may” in Clause 147 to make it “shall”. It is creating another “shall” in Clause 145. Then, we will have a “may” in Clause 147. We will end up with two laws that are conflicting; one will be mandatory and another optional. The other issue I just want to have here is that, if you read the New Clause 145A(2) being introduced, it is basically saying that the Authority shall grant more than one licence provided it has received more than one application and the applicants have the conditions. So, what is the impact of this?"
}