GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/800678/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 800678,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/800678/?format=api",
"text_counter": 238,
"type": "other",
"speaker_name": "",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "an advisory opinion, No.2 of 2013, the Supreme Court had an opportunity to consider what Article 110 means when it talks of bills that affect the functions and powers of county governments. In paragraph 102 of that decision, the Supreme Court placed a lot of responsibility on the Office of the Speaker. At paragraph 102, the Supreme Court hailed that with a good Speaker, the Senate should find something that affects the functions of counties in almost every Bill that is processed by Parliament. Therefore, I do not understand the wisdom of the National Assembly when they want to lock out the Senate from considering legislations that ordinarily affect the counties and the functions of the county governments. If we, as a Senate, want to have good presence in our functions then each ---"
}