GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/811036/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 811036,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/811036/?format=api",
"text_counter": 188,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Samburu West, KANU",
"speaker_title": "Hon. (Ms.) Naisula Lesuuda",
"speaker": {
"id": 13122,
"legal_name": "Naisula Lesuuda",
"slug": "naisula-lesuuda"
},
"content": " And then later come and tell us it was just cautionary. We were just cautioning you that now it is moisture. However, most importantly, in one of the conclusions, the Committees said this: “The Committee received presentations from the Ministry of Health indicating that from a sample size of 174 collected across the country 60 per cent did not meet the national standard on moisture content hence not fit for human consumption. The Ministry of Health assured the Committee that the contaminated lots are under seizure pending destruction.” Now I have a further request as they go to do their final Report. For sure you have said 60 per cent of the sugar is not safe. A question that I also asked the relevant authorities when I went to sit with the Committees and we still need an answer for it is: Apart from the sugar which they have only sampled at the warehouses in bulk, can the relevant authorities find out about the sugar on our shelves in our supermarkets and tell us whether it is safe? It is just out there in warehouses. What about the sugar that already left the warehouses and came to our shelves which we are now consuming as Kenyans in our houses? We need that answer as a further answer to what they have said it is not fit for consumption. The electronic version of the Official Hansard Report is for information purposes only. Acertified version of this Report can be obtained from the Hansard Editor."
}