GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/816319/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 816319,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/816319/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 264,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Hon. Speaker",
    "speaker_title": "",
    "speaker": null,
    "content": "am already before court. I do not know why you are wasting my time.” When you start saying the member is being rude to you, he says: “No. I cannot tell you anything. My divulging anything may compromise my own defence.” That person would be right. Is it not so? We should be fair. It cannot be that you are investigating a matter which has already been investigated by the people you are likely to recommend to investigate and have already taken action which you may recommend they take. When that action is going on, you are still investigating. Surely, we can use our man hours and resources better. Hon. Gikaria, if that matter is the same in substance as those which are likely to come in that criminal case, perhaps, the best situation will be for you to stay, not to drop, any further engagement with the persons who are likely also to be called by the DPP or whoever to be witnesses. In fairness, we should have the interests of other Kenyans at heart even as we execute our respective mandates. The advice from me would be you stay further proceedings and not to drop. Await the result. If the matter is not covered by that other case, you can take it up. You can resurrect it. Very well. Yes, Hon. Cheptumo."
}