GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/81667/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept
{
"id": 81667,
"url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/81667/?format=api",
"text_counter": 380,
"type": "speech",
"speaker_name": "Mr. Deputy Speaker",
"speaker_title": "",
"speaker": null,
"content": "Fair enough! The issue here is the constitutionality of the Motion itself. The Constitution is very explicit on public finance. Section 201 talks about principles of public finance. It reads: âThe following principles shall guide all aspects of public finance in the Republicâ (a) there shall be openness and accountability, including public participation in financial matters; (b) the public finance system shall promote an equitable society, and in particularâ (i) the burden of taxation shall be shared fairly; (ii) revenue raised nationally shall be shared equitably among national and county governments; and, (iii) expenditure shall promote the equitable development of the country, including by making special provision for marginalized groups and areas; (c) the burdens and benefits of the use of resources and public borrowing shall be shared equitably between present and future generations; (d) public money shall be used in a prudent and responsible way; and, (e) financial management shall be responsible, and fiscal reporting shall be clear.â"
}