Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 829347,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/829347/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 416,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Rarieda, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) Otiende Amollo",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13465,
        "legal_name": "Paul Otiende Amollo",
        "slug": "paul-otiende-amollo"
    },
    "content": "more before we endorse it. When in New Clause 25B(1) it states: “...granted by the Board with the approval of the relevant ethics body”, it would be good to indicate specifically which this ethics body is. My information is that we have about 22 research ethics review committees approved in the country. It might introduce some confusion when you just say “relevant ethics body”. It might not be clear whether it is the internal one to the board or an external one. Secondly, the relation of those provisions to the Science and Innovation Act of 2014 which also appears to regulate clinical trials bears some clarity. Otherwise, we might be legislating in contradiction."
}