GET /api/v0.1/hansard/entries/832360/?format=api
HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 832360,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/832360/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 761,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Kiharu, JP",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Ndindi Nyoro",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13370,
        "legal_name": "Samson Ndindi Nyoro",
        "slug": "samson-ndindi-nyoro"
    },
    "content": "into that system which is uniform across the constituencies. I believe that would solve a lot of issues in so far as audit queries are concerned. The same would happen to projects. Instead of a sub-committee on oversight from NG- CDF coming blindly to any constituency, they ought to have a uniform system where if, for example, I am building 20 schools, the fund manager in Kiharu has a system that manages efficiently how the money is disbursed and spent. Lastly, one thing that I will keep saying in this House over and over again is about inequality when it comes to disbursement of NG-CDF. It is not fair and it cannot be termed as justice that a Member of Parliament with a constituency with 200 schools, or with a land mass that is equal to that, and with a population that is so high, to be given the same amount of money as a person with a quarter of the same population, number of schools, land mass and so on. It is high time we revised how NG-CDF is disbursed. This blanket equity is not just about equality; this equity is discriminative. There is no way, for example, standing here as a Member for Kiharu, with 120,000 registered voters and 200 schools, I can be given the same amount of money with someone who has 20,000 registered voters, four schools and a few people to give bursaries to. This is an issue that we have to address because it is discriminatory and is making"
}