Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 844226,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/844226/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 143,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Nyando, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. Jared Okelo",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 13457,
        "legal_name": "Jared Odoyo Okelo",
        "slug": "jared-odoyo-okelo-2"
    },
    "content": "from practicing what may then be construed to be a tradition of the court. In Section 21 of the Supreme Court Act says that even though decisions of the Supreme Court will be binding, there is provision upon which somebody can ask for review of the Supreme Court’s decision itself. A clear reading of the Regulations of the Supreme Court gives a litigant, who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Supreme Court, to file a review within a set time, which is 14 days upon the delivery of judgment. My concern basically is that we know that this is a House of rules. It is governed by its own set rules, traditions, Standing Orders, the Constitution and many other things. But to take you back a little bit to the issue of the Supreme Court, it only takes somebody for litigation on issues that are extraneous and exceptional circumstances."
}