Entry Instance

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "id": 847779,
    "url": "https://info.mzalendo.com/api/v0.1/hansard/entries/847779/?format=api",
    "text_counter": 226,
    "type": "speech",
    "speaker_name": "Seme, ODM",
    "speaker_title": "Hon. (Dr.) James Nyikal",
    "speaker": {
        "id": 434,
        "legal_name": "James Nyikal",
        "slug": "james-nyikal"
    },
    "content": " What is coming out is that we probably have the title being inappropriate. It is talking of ‘where greater than’. But if you read all that section, it is talking of ‘taking possession of’. So, if the Chair were to say that, that title is inappropriate for that section, it would make sense. Other than that, we will need more explanation. All it is talking about is ‘taking possession of’ all through. I would support it if it were to be as I have said. Unless we are given further information, it will look vague. If the explanation that the title as it is in the law is vague and it is not in line with what you are seeing, you can. If you look at Clause 120(1), after the award has been given, it is about possession. Clause 120(2) is about possession. If you go over and look at Clause 120(3), it is ‘taking possession’. If you look at Clause 120, additional compensation where the area is found to be greater, you do not find any information in the whole of that law. It is talking of what is to be done where the area is found to be greater. The Chair would help us if he told us where that would have fit - what is in Clause 120 now - as a title or a sub- title."
}